adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released.
Legal and Ethical Issues Related to Psychiatric Emergencies
Legal and ethical issues related to psychiatric emergencies are at the forefront of contemporary healthcare discussions. As the recognition of mental health issues and their impact on individuals and society grows, so does the importance of addressing the complex legal and ethical considerations that surround psychiatric crises (Stoll et al., 2020).
These issues encompass a broad spectrum, including involuntary hospitalization, patient rights, the duty of care, and the balancing act between personal autonomy and the necessity of providing treatment. Understanding and navigating these intricate matters is essential for healthcare professionals and a critical component of upholding the rights and well-being of individuals experiencing psychiatric emergencies.
State Laws for Involuntary Psychiatric Holds
In Maryland, laws regarding involuntary psychiatric holds for both child and adult psychiatric emergencies are in place to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals experiencing acute mental health crises. For adults in Maryland, an involuntary psychiatric hold is typically referred to as a “Petition for Emergency Evaluation” or “Emergency Petition” (Lee & Cohen, 2021). This process allows certain individuals, including law enforcement officers, mental health professionals, or concerned family members, to initiate an emergency evaluation for an adult who is believed to pose a danger to.